New Rules on Rebuilds, FEMA Says No to Wet Feet
The federal government has spliced a formal recognition of climate change into national building policies. The milestone rule, announced July 10 by the Biden Administration’s Federal Emergency Management Agency, requires that new construction projects supported by federal emergency funding be built to withstand extreme floods, including high waters resulting from the anticipated rise in sea level. The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard will take effect September 9 and finishes an initiative kicked off by President Barack Obama, with Joe Biden then as Vice-President, almost a decade ago.
The new building rules, which the Trump Administration retracted in 2017 before they could take effect in their first iteration, require federal officials to specifically set necessary dimensions for a planned project – namely width, height, and coverage – to protect it and the immediate community against flooding. The rule will affect public infrastructure like roadways, bridges, and water and sewer lines as well as community services like schools, libraries, fire and police stations, and public recreation sites. Only projects funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, are subject to the rules.
Environmental groups have cheered the flooding risk management standard as an important defensive step forward as the planet warms, sea level rises, and storms hit communities with amplified force.
“This is about planning for the future, and it’s based on the latest and best available science,” said Shana Udvardy, senior climate resilience policy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Severe storms and flooding are two of the three most destructive types of natural disasters in the United States and, according to federal estimates, have caused more than half a trillion dollars in damage since 1980. In California, devastating floods of recent winters in the San Joaquin Valley and Central Coast regions have highlighted local vulnerabilities to high waters, and in coastal communities around the Bay Area, rising sea level is an ever-present threat. While the new standards represent an important recognition of flood dangers, the California Ocean Protection Council’s 2024 Sea Level Rise Guidance report anticipates an increase of local sea level by as much as 3.1 feet – conspicuously more than the federal rule’s recommendation that construction be elevated above local flood levels by two to three feet.
Jon Rosenfield, the science director with San Francisco Baykeeper, says he applauds the intent of the federal rule but thinks it may be overlooking certain basic threats of rising sea level. For one, he says, sea level rise doesn’t only correspond to inundated surface area but also can cause encroachment of groundwater into developed areas – a process that can undermine infrastructure sites and polluted soils before they are technically flooded. The other shortcoming Rosenfield sees is that some of FEMA’s flood risk maps, which establish base flood levels, are out of date.
“It’s very good that the Biden Administration is highlighting this issue that places not threatened by flooding now will be in the future, but the baseline that’s being used is not adequate,” he said.
Bay Area infrastructure sites most threatened by flooding as sea level rises, Rosenfield says, include several wastewater treatment plants, bridge foundations, and East Bay freeways.
Other Recent Posts
Black Churches Put Faith Into Climate Action
Everyday Climate Champions Podcast
How to Keep Our Furry Friends Cool in Record Temperatures
We talked to the House Rabbit Society and Bay Area pet owners to gather practical advice about how to keep animals cool during hot weather.
Dancers & Divas Conjure Climate Art and Island History
Musicians, storytellers, photographers, and an aerial dance troupe explore sea level rise in a year-long series of arts events in Alameda.
Don’t Count on Kelp to Buffer the Coast
Before breaking on the coast, California waves may pass through kelp forests, but whether this softens coastal erosion like other “blue infrastructure” is difficult to pin down.
Pros and Cons of Hydrogen in the Climate Space
An inside look at the advantages and challenges of hydrogen fuel in California’s clean energy strategy. A new ferry in San Francisco showboats the hydrogen “gold rush.”
When Hot Gets Hotter
Recent research from UC Berkeley’s David Romps explores how extreme heat and humidity push the body to its physiological limits.
Ashland Trades in Car Lot for Community Zocalo
An unincorporated area of Alameda County identified by local government as in need of more park space got a new, climate resilient gathering spot and “town square” this summer.
Be Prepared for So Much More than the Big One
A reporter visits the LA Disasters Expo to get expert advice and finds a suite of products for securing your home, building a community network, and preparing for emergencies.
Getting Serious at the City & County Scale About Future Flood Threats
BCDC’s Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan lays out four “Minimum Standards” that Bay Area municipalities must meet as they prepare for sea level rise.
Got Climate Anxiety? What Young Folks Should Know
Climate anxiety in younger generations is on the rise across the globe. Google searches for “climate anxiety” soared by 565% in 2021.
While the new rules will burden developers with higher upfront project costs, this impact, Udvardy and others argue, will be relatively insignificant. For one thing, the federal government will pay 75% of the increased cost of affected projects, leaving developers paying an average of just 2% more. For a $1 million job, that’s less than $5,000.
Moreover, money invested in more resilient infrastructure tends to be cash well spent. A report from the National Institute of Building Sciences shows that every dollar invested to protect against riverine flooding, for example, means $6 saved later when waters rise.
“This ensures that we invest our taxpayer dollars responsibly,” Udvardy said.
